I

the difference between a real man and a pseudo man, that is, between one who has his own I and one who has not, is indicated in the analogy by the passenger sitting in the carriage; in the first case, the passenger is the owner of the carriage; in the second he is simply the first chance passerby, from B1192; and B1191 ff

I, that is, this something-unknown of mine, which in ancient times one crank defined as a relatively transferable arising, depending on the quality of the functioning of thought, feeling, and organic automatism B38

I is defined as the compound result of consciousness, subconsciousness, and instinct-Mal-el-Lel and Xenophon B38

the whole of my entirety in which the aforesaid I plays a very small part-the Author B44

Belcultassi recalled how and when he had manifested consciously with his I or had acted automatically under the direction of his instinct alone B295

Hamolinadir already had his I at the maximum stability for three-centered beings B332 ff

all the separate ruminating parts representing the whole of my I B359

my essence prompts me and animates my I and all the separately spiritualized parts of my common presence B529

my whole inner real I-the sympathetic Persian B996 ff

but never do their outer manifestations in general nor those inner-being-impulses of theirs, which ought to be under the directive of their being-I, proceed according to their own wish resulting from the whole of their entire presence B1082

the fourth personality is that part which is called, in a being, I B1190

a man who has in his common presence his own I enters one of the streams of the river of life; and the man who has not, enters the other B1229; and B1227

the possibility is foreseen for beings to acquire the kernel of their essence, that is to say, their own I B1231

and B246 B492 B529 B617

see IT